By Rich Lowry
Syndicated Columnist
The Harris campaign is a testament to the toxicity of woke politics
We’ve passed the peak of woke politics in the U.S., and the Harris for president campaign was the leading indicator. Of all the things that Kamala Harris wanted you to know about her — that she grew up in a middle-class family, that she’s not Joe Biden, that she had a “to-do list” for the American people — perhaps foremost among them is that she was not woke.
She didn’t have any rote line asserting this, but achieving distance from the fashionable left-wing politics that defined the Trump years and their immediate aftermath motivated much of what she says and does.
That Harris felt compelled to disavow so many of the ideas that she once embraced is a powerful testament to their political toxicity.
An idea has won or lost in American politics when both parties favor or oppose it, or simply don’t want to fight over it anymore. Ronald Reagan’s economics truly prevailed when the Democratic Party, via Bill Clinton in the early 1990s, accepted his basic approach. Gay marriage won politically when Republicans decided to stop talking about the issue.
By this standard, woke attitudes and policies are in marked decline, and Kamala Harris was Exhibit A. Except for her abortion radicalism, she’s turned her back on much of what she once professed to believe or sympathize with.
~~ Defund the police? Absolutely not.
~~ Abolish ICE? No way.
~~ DEI? Haven’t heard of it.
~~ Medicare for All? That was a long time ago.
~~ The Green New Deal? Let’s not get carried away.
She had backed off her extravagant positions on the trans issue and the border. She insisted that rather than pushing the envelope on either, she simply wanted to follow the law. You could be forgiven for thinking the only pronouns she knows are she/her and he/him.
Harris didn’t bring up identity politics at all. Not only does she not talk about the once-ubiquitous concepts of white privilege or “equity,” she didn’t even talk about breaking the glass ceiling or the history-making nature of her candidacy. Listening to her campaign, you’d have had no idea that the twin “isms” — racism and sexism — have been consuming obsessions of the Left for years now.
There was no hint of the hostility toward law enforcement that characterized progressivism with the rise of Black Lives Matter. No, Harris was a Glock-wielding tough-as-nails prosecutor, who, you might have heard, is the only person in the race who has prosecuted transnational gangs.
This was as complete a volte-face as we’ve seen in recent American politics. In French Revolution terms, Harris once was a fellow traveler with Robespierre, the famous radical, but then was happy to go along with the Thermidorian Reaction that toppled him. It’s as if William Jennings Bryan decided, after inveighing against them so famously, that the gold standard and Eastern financial interests weren’t so bad after all.
What happened was that many Democratic politicians believed that the reaction to Trump and the revulsion over the killing of George Floyd had fundamentally reoriented American politics and the hothouse leftism of college campus could be exported to the country at large. In reality, most people were never on board. Joe Biden wouldn’t have won the presidency in 2020 if he’d been woke, and Kamala Harris wouldn’t have been in the race now if she were still running on her erstwhile causes.
By no means does this suggest that woke priorities are on their way out. They are still dominant in academia and in other elite institutions, and if she had won, Harris could still pursue them.
Her sincerity was neither here nor there, though. That a politician who marinated for decades in progressive California and who once espoused or sounded favorable to every single woke priority realized that she can’t do so and appeal to a majority of Americans speaks volumes. Harris, who doesn’t have great political instincts, even she got this.
Rich Lowry is editor of the National Review.
(c) 2024 by King Features Synd., Inc.